My next few posts are going to be centered on Doug Macleod. The
International Blues Foundation honored him in 2014 as the Acoustic Artist of
the Year and also awarded his latest album, “There Comes a Time” as the
Acoustic Album of the Year.
To my knowledge, MacLeod is unique among successful blues
performers in that he only performs his own original songs. He is one of the
few solo artists that are featured performers at major blues festivals. He has recorded
22 albums of his material plus an instructional DVD.
I will explore:
How does he do it? Why is he successful as a solo acoustic artist
in a field dominated by electric bands? What can I learn from Doug that would
help me grow as a blues singer-songwriter?
My focus is on his songwriting, but as I've been listening
to the man I have come to think that the songs can’t be separated from the
performance. And it makes me wonder to what extent this is true for blues in
general. While there are blues songwriters whose songs are mostly recorded by
other people (Gary Nicholson for example), MacLeod is more of a singer-songwriter.
He has had a dozen-or-so cuts by other artists but the overwhelming majority of
his songs have been played by Doug only.
Let me over-generalize to make a point. It seems to me that
blues audiences are the most enthralled when an instrumentalist takes a solo.
Close second – the band is tight, in the groove, a good beat, playing off one
another and it makes you want to dance. Vocal performance runs third in holding
their attention, and the words of a song don’t really matter. Sure, if you go
out to hear Janiva Magness the vocals are going to be your focus, but for nine
out of ten acts at a typical blues festival, the melody and words are not the
main source of audience satisfaction. Songwriting is all about melody and words.
Doug MacLeod’s words matter a lot – and his delivery ensures
you know what he is saying. His singing is excellent – he has a good range,
multiple vocal “personalities”, always expressive and soulful. He will draw you
in with this storytelling between (and within) songs. But how successful would
he be if he weren’t an absolute motherfucker on guitar? His playing is always sensitive,
expressive and appropriate for the song, though he can whip out licks that make
your jaw drop any time he feels like it. Do you think instrumental performance
is the most important thing? I’d really like to know!
I thought it would be interesting to look at how his writing
has developed over the past twenty years; approximately the period since he
became mainly a solo performer. I am listening and making notes about three
albums recorded between 1996 and 2000, and three albums from the past five years.
What topics or themes did he sing about in the 90’s versus
what concerns him today? Has his language changed?
Listening to Doug MacLeod’s music is time well spent. OK,
then, let's go!.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I welcome your ideas and comments